Canadian Criminal Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Canadian Criminal Justice System - Essay eventThis paper will analyze the discriminative corpse of Canada and the application of distressing responsibilities for rape crimes, in this country. Canadian Criminal Justice System The legal system of Canadian is based on English rough-cut Law (old), which were brought by explorers and colonists. The law of the immigrants prevailed over the rules of the Canadian settlers, and the law of the immigrants guided the conduct of people in Canada for a long time. The judicial system is crucial in a country it facilitates the application of jurist in the society, and it helps punish the law breakers. Most aspects of the Canadian lamentable justice system argon comical and different from other systems in the world. However, the Canadian system of criminal justice inclines towards utilizing the due process model. The louches rights are respected and protected until their guilt is proven, without doubt. This is one of the most significant ten ets therefore, a person charged with criminal umbrage (criminal) is only proved guilty by a jury. Otherwise, a suspect of a criminal offense is treated and believed to be guilty during the process of trial, in a law court. In the event that the law are convinced that their grounds are adequate to proceed with a criminal charge against an accuse person, then the incriminate is apprehended to answer the charges before the court (Howe & Russell, 2001). Further, the accused person is entitled to an low-priced bail. In the event that the issue reaches the stage of trial, the crown attorney who is prosecuting the accused person assumes the responsibility of proving that therefore the suspect committed the offense. For instance, if it is a murder charge, the crown attorney will call the people who witnessed the accused committing the crime, and in other forms of crimes like rape or robbery, the attorney will call the victims to testify against the suspect (Howe & Russell, 2001). Depen ding with the strength of proof presented by the prosecutor, the suspect may call on his own witnesses who would bring honest doubt to the case. In such an event, the jury is left with the mandate to pass judgment, with regard to the available evidence and witnesses. At this stage, the case goes to sentencing stage where the judge passes the sentence, either acquitting the accused if there is no substantive evidence, or a jail term in proportion with the nature of the criminal offence (Ehrlich, 2001). This model utilizes the adversarial system where the judge acts as an independent arbiter, and he is the one who adjudicates between the prosecutor and his witnesses and the accused and his witnesses. Apparently, the paper has disrobed the judicial system that exists in Canada, and it will shift the focus on investigating the applicability and assignment of criminal responsibility to sexual offenders. Rape is described as the act of forcibly having sexual give with a female partner, without her consent. Sexual offences are further incorporated with having sexual contact with persons who are minors. Sexual contact with minors is another serious criminal offence, which can attract heavy fines and long jail sentences. The pursuits of these cases are based on the two popular models of justice, which are employed by the Canadian law enforcement agencies, as well as the judicial system (Ehrlich, 2001). The initial model that is employed in assigning criminal responsi